top of page

The Slippery Slope of Anxiety Over Leadership

Most people slow down when they pass an accident.


They don’t need to. Traffic would move just fine without the extra brake lights. Yet they slow

down anyway. Why? What are they looking for? A crushed bumper? A shattered windshield? Someone sitting on the curb with their head in their hands? Or do they slow down long enough to offer a silent prayer for life, health, and recovery—and then move forward with focus?


Leadership works the same way.


When something disruptive happens—economic uncertainty, cultural tension, technological disruption, internal conflict—leaders have a choice. They can slow down out of fear and stare at the wreckage. Or they can slow down with purpose, assess clearly, and move forward decisively.


We are already a quarter into this year. Yes - 3 months are in the rearview mirror. For some, that realization feels energizing. For others, it feels overwhelming. There’s too much to do. Too much noise. Too much change. AI is moving fast. Expectations are rising. Culture feels fragile.  Aaaagh!


It’s easy to slip from leadership into anxiety.


But fear-based leadership creates cultures that hesitate, react, and protect. Curious leadership creates cultures that engage, learn, and build. Consider the path of history. Rights that “existed on paper” often lagged behind real acceptance and application. The 15th Amendment passed in 1870 gave Black men the right to vote, yet systemic barriers persisted. The 19th Amendment gave women the vote in 1920 (50 years later) —but not all women equally (only white women). The Voting Rights Act of 1965 addressed disparities that had endured nearly a century. 


A law can mandate behavior. It cannot mandate belief.


And that distinction matters deeply in leadership. You can announce new policies around diversity, inclusion, or collaboration. You can declare values. You can post mission statements. But unless leaders model curiosity and courageous communication, culture will default to suspicion, fear, and silent judgment.


Model: Set the Example

Leadership begins with a visible example. If you want a culture that is open, you must be open. If you want a culture that listens, you must listen first. If you want a culture that gives grace, you must demonstrate grace under pressure.


Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. did not simply speak about unity; he embodied nonviolent conviction under extreme hostility. His leadership model created moral clarity in chaotic conditions. The same was true for many civil rights leaders who stood beside him. They didn’t wait for culture to change before they modeled courage.


In today’s context, modeling leadership means:

– Speaking about difficult topics without inflaming them – Asking questions instead of making assumptions – Refusing to stereotype—even when stereotypes are socially rewarded – Correcting prejudice without humiliating people When leaders react from fear, their teams learn fear. When leaders react with disciplined curiosity, their teams learn stability.


Focus: Culture and Communication

Culture is shaped by what leaders tolerate, reward, and repeat.


Discrimination does not disappear simply because policy prohibits it. Bias does not evaporate because a memo says it should. Prejudice persists when communication shuts down.


In many workplaces today, people are hesitant. They are afraid of saying the wrong thing. Afraid of being labeled. Afraid of being misunderstood. Fear-driven cultures reduce communication. And reduced communication increases misunderstanding.  It’s a vicious circle.


Leadership requires creating environments where respectful dialogue is not only permitted but expected. This does not mean endorsing harmful viewpoints. It means refusing to replace one form of intolerance with another. It means teaching people how to disagree constructively. If someone says something rooted in ignorance, the leadership response cannot be silent avoidance or public shaming. It must be structured engagement.


Equip: Systems and Skills

Curious leadership is not accidental. It is built.


Here are three systems leaders can implement:

  1. Structured Listening Sessions Create facilitated environments where team members can express perspectives without interruption. The goal is not immediate agreement. The goal is understanding.

  2. Assumption Audits Before major decisions, ask: – What assumptions are we making? – Who might see this differently? – What voices are missing from the room?

    This simple system shifts culture from reaction to reflection.

  3. Communication Training Equip leaders and managers with practical skills: – How to ask clarifying questions – How to separate intent from impact – How to respond without escalating


Leadership is not about eliminating conflict. It is about navigating it without losing trust.


So the question returns:

When you see disruption—cultural tension, social division, technological change—are you slowing down out of fear? Or are you slowing down to lead?

bottom of page